Kaedim · SKU Signal← Board

Playbook

The inheritable playbook: three plays, selected per lead by verified signal mix.

Beat the req

Stacked: funded + hiring. Hard window — expires when the seat fills.

Email template

Subject: your [ROLE TITLE] req + a faster path

[NAME] — saw the [ROLE TITLE] posting went up on [REQ DATE], not long after the [ROUND] closed. Congrats on both.

Filling that seat takes 6–10 weeks. In that window your catalog/roadmap doesn't wait — which is usually why the req exists.

Before you commit the seat: send us 5 [SKUs/assets] this week. Production-ready 3D back in ~48h, built by Kaedim's AI + artist pipeline. Kaedim customers have seen production speedups of up to 7x (Upland: 70% faster across a 5,000-asset batch).

That req represents roughly [MONEY FIGURE]/yr of production capacity. Worth seeing what a pilot covers before it's committed.

Open to a 20-min look this week?

[SIGNATURE]

First-call script

OPENER (15s): "Hi [NAME] — [YOUR NAME] from Kaedim. Reason for the call: I saw your [ROLE TITLE] req from [REQ DATE], right after the [ROUND] — I work with brands/studios at exactly that moment, and I'll be brief."
DISCOVERY:
1. "What's driving the hire — backlog, new launches, or a capability you don't have in-house?"
2. "How many assets does the next two quarters actually require?"
3. "What happens to that pipeline during the 6–10 weeks the seat is empty?"
MONEY: "That req is roughly [MONEY FIGURE] a year of production capacity — a pilot shows you what portion of that Kaedim absorbs before you commit it."
OBJECTION — "we're already hiring for this": "Good — keep hiring. The pilot answers a different question: what your new artist should DIRECT versus hand-build. Teams keep the hire and multiply them."
CTA: "Send 5 [SKUs/assets] today, production-ready 3D back in ~48 hours, then 20 minutes to review the output together. Fair?"

Multiply the artist

Hiring only. The incoming artist becomes the champion, never the casualty.

Email template

Subject: before your next 3D hire starts

[NAME] — saw you're hiring a [ROLE TITLE] ([REQ DATE]). Not writing to talk you out of it.

A solo 3D artist becomes the production bottleneck the day they start — every variant, every revision queues behind one person. The teams that scale put their artist in the director's chair and let an elastic pipeline do volume.

That's Kaedim: AI + human artists, production-ready assets in ~48h, your artist reviews and directs. Customers have seen up to 7x production speedups (Upland: 70% faster on a 5,000-asset batch).

Your open req represents about [MONEY FIGURE]/yr of capacity. A 5-asset pilot shows what your hire could direct instead of hand-build.

Worth 20 minutes?

[SIGNATURE]

First-call script

OPENER (15s): "Hi [NAME] — [YOUR NAME] from Kaedim. I saw the [ROLE TITLE] posting from [REQ DATE]. One idea worth 60 seconds: how to make that hire count as four."
DISCOVERY:
1. "Is this your first dedicated 3D hire, or expanding a team?"
2. "What does their week look like — new builds, variants, revisions?"
3. "When volume spikes past one person, what's the plan — freelancers, agency, backlog?"
MONEY: "The req is about [MONEY FIGURE] a year of production capacity. The question is whether that budget buys one pair of hands or a directed pipeline."
OBJECTION — "we just hired someone / offer is out": "Perfect timing, honestly. Your new artist directing Kaedim output beats them buried in variant work by week two. The pilot gives them that leverage on day one."
CTA: "5 assets through the pipeline this week, your (incoming) artist reviews the output — 20 minutes after. Fair?"

Content ahead of the catalog

Funded only. Soft timing — preempt the content crunch.

Email template

Subject: the content crunch after the [ROUND]

[NAME] — congrats on the [ROUND] ([RAISE DATE]).

The pattern after a raise: more [SKUs/content scope], more channels, faster launches — and 3D/CGI production is the step that doesn't scale linearly with money. It shows up as a crunch two quarters in, usually as an urgent req or an agency invoice.

Kaedim absorbs that spike without the team build: AI + human artists, production-ready 3D in ~48h. Customers have seen up to 7x production speedups (Upland: 70% faster across a 5,000-asset batch).

Building the equivalent in-house starts at roughly [MONEY FIGURE]/yr per artist before the backlog clears.

Worth scoping your launch calendar against a 5-asset pilot? 20 minutes.

[SIGNATURE]

First-call script

OPENER (15s): "Hi [NAME] — [YOUR NAME] from Kaedim. Congrats on the [ROUND]. I call at exactly this moment because the content crunch that follows a raise is predictable — and cheap to preempt."
DISCOVERY:
1. "What does the raise accelerate — SKU count, new channels, launch cadence?"
2. "How is product/3D content produced today — in-house, agency, founder-does-it?"
3. "What's the launch calendar look like over the next two quarters?"
MONEY: "An in-house 3D artist runs about [MONEY FIGURE] a year loaded, plus 6–10 weeks to hire. The pilot shows what that budget buys through Kaedim instead — before the crunch prices it for you."
OBJECTION — "too early / no 3D need yet": "That's the point — 'no need yet' is when the pilot is free information. If the launch calendar says otherwise in Q3, you'll already know your per-asset economics."
CTA: "Pick 5 products/concepts, we return production-ready 3D in ~48 hours, 20 minutes to review. Fair?"